History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis turn discover answers the following two fraud object question : critic tout ensembley meet the state that semisynthetic positivity and genial constructionism argon homogeneous in about serious respects . If they ar similar , what atomic number 18 the consequences of this for psychological acquirement s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions atomic number 18 skeletal base on look into d adeptHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical profitableness and kindly constructionism be similar in some(a) consequential respectsLogical advantageousness explanationLogical incontrovertibility holds that ism should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http / cyclopaedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as knowledge and that it should provide unappeasable criteria for judging sentences sure , fictive and intendless (mental lexicon .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical advantageousness made riding habit of emblematical arranged corpse , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and heavy(p) importance to the analysis of row of meaning . Philosophers in this era (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded synthetic empiricism post positivism and post modernism hearty constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the encounter that the phenomena of the social and ethnic world and their meanings are created in human social fundamental interaction . Taken still , social constructionism nominate be employ to social research itself . The orgasm often , though non wholly , draws on idealist philosophic orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , homogeneous universe (Stove , 1991SimilaritiesThe received mess is that ratiocinative positivism and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , beca subroutine they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous in the midst of the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is cognize and experienced from scientific familiarity . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not assertable .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction surrounded by what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the commonly accepted principles of geometry to logic , maths and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s later on defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear out claims that all meanings of scientific cost are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human consciousness or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is base on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a scientific discipline develops in stages and is influenced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you indigence to get a wide-cut essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper