Analysis of the French Ambassadors

Holbeins piece of the French Ambassadors (23-11) depicts two stack standing in what come outs to be an office or consider. One public, the peerless on the remaining seems to be a patron or mostwhat sort of a wealthy manhood. You can enounce by the costume he is wearing and how much much dignified he looks than from the man on his right. The landowner has a fancy coat farm animald with some sort of fur. He has on some jewelry, a necklace, hanging from his neck. In his right hand he seems to be holding some frame of instrument showing he is an educated man.His calculate is rendered with more naturalism than his peer on the right. He in any case seems to be bit more lively in spirit. The landowner is leaning upon a defer that is plastered with galore(postnominal) other instruments for collecting data. These tools are symbols that these two men arent your ordinary common folk, they are more like scholars and have curiosities near many polar things in life as what w as a chief(prenominal) rootage of the Renaissance. The globes on the control boards indicate an interest in astronomy and geology.It could also be a reference to Nicholas Copernicus a Renaissance astronomer who was the graduation exercise to theorize that the earth wasnt the center of the universe. Other instruments on the bow indicate interests in mathematics, as in that location seems to be some third power object with numbers and angles maybe referring to geometry. Also on the table there is a mandolin signifying that not only are these two practiced purely scholars, but lively entertaining people or cultur exclusivelyy versatile people.Another object on the table has to be the open books, which seem to be journals or diaries of some sort because of how there is a plume pen marking a spot in one. On the table there is a mantle but to me it looks more than just a decorative pattern for protection of a table but a tapestry of some sort. Above and behind the men and the ta ble is a green patterned curtain. The drapery on the curtain causes your eyes to devolve downward upon to the men and the table. The man on the right is dressed in black robes, clothing of a clergyman with a pair of gloves in his hand.If the clothes arent enough, he also has the white collar that all Catholic members of the church wear. The lighting in this painting is coming from the left as you can tell from how the landowners bet seems to be more brightly lit than the clergymans. also you can tell by how on the clergymans side the painting gets stepwise darker. One important thing about this painting is also the face of the gentlemen. In a way it seems as if two different artists of different caliber painted the faces. The landowners face looks loquent and beautiful, while the clergymans face looks simple and without much enthusiasm.The biggest concept of this physical body has to be the grayish line of some sort running through the ground. This object is an anamorphic image and the most interesting part of this painting. An anamorphic image is a malformed image that is only viewable from a certain angle or through a mirror. When looking at the painting from a disgrace angle and tilting your head towards the left you see an image of a skull. This skull is a symbol that can mean two different things.One is the study of skills of the human body as there is no evidence of canvas the human body is shown on the table that is supposed to represent education. The skull shows that the ponderings of the science of the human body bring these two men together. Another explanation for the symbol of the skull is to remind the viewer that even with all these great advancements and breakthroughs that man is still mortal and eventually one will die. The theme at first that I got was that men of the renaissance were greatly interested in the fine arts and education.Once looking at the painting more in depth and various times I see that that is just scratching the s urface. The theme for this painting is how even though the Church and Landowners/ splendour and wealthy were of such different social classes and distinctions, and even though they had many differences, they were brought together by their thirst for knowledge about everything they could imagine of. This theme comes through how the two men are leaning on the table full of symbols of education and higher learning showing their interests in it.