National Advocacy Paper (political science) Research

National advocacy (political science) - Research Paper ExampleLike the Arizona anti-immigration legal philosophy, the Alabama Bill has been the subject of much parameter and controversy. Hammons campaign sentiments express the general views of those who support Arizona-style anti-immigration laws. Hammon said Weve let this go on in any case long. Our budget cannot handle it. Our justice system cannot handle all the crime. We want them to stop taking vantage of our benefits (Beyerle 2011). These sentiments reflect the concern that undocumented individuals are taking jobs that American citizens can have. More troubling however, undocumented aliens do not pay income taxes and as a result the government is denied a valuable reservoir of revenue. If American citizens held the jobs that are currently sign onn by undocumented aliens, their income would be taxed. Complicating matters, undocumented aliens typically turn on their income to family and loved ones in their countries of ori gin, thus add to or worsening the depressed economy (Langley 2007, p. 19). Ultimately, arguments in opt of anti-immigration laws that mirror the Arizona immigration law and the Alabama Bill take the position that, illegal aliens take away from the economy rather than contribute to it. At the same time, illegal aliens enjoy the benefits that come with contributing to economic growth and tax revenues. The extent of those benefits are manifested by the fact that they live in the US and use facilities supported by tax-payers, such as schools, hospitals, parks, roads and other essential provisions and creature comforts (Langley 2007, pp. 19-20). As for crime, the Testimony of District Attorney John M. Morganelli befor the House Subcommittee on Immigration Border, Security and Claims reflects the concerns or so illegal immigration and crime. Morganelli noted that The majority of illegal aliens who are here are engaged in vicious activity. Identity theft, use of fraudulent social secu rity numbers and green cards, tax evasion, movement without licenses represent some of the crimes that are engaged in by the majority of illegal aliens on a daily basis merely to maintain and hide their illegal status (The Dark Side of nefarious Immigration, n.d.). There is no denying the authenticity of these concerns. Any time an event or a system of events contributes toward criminal activity and economic decline, it requires immediate attention and resolution. The obvious question is then, why are anti-immigration laws so controversial? Why was there so much debate and controversy over Arizonas anti-immigration law? Why should these controversies and debates concern Alabamas law-makers and any other state seeking to judge the immigration issues identified in the preceding passages? The other side of the argument sheds some light on the contentious issues surrounding the immigration issue. The primary concern for advocates against the Alabama Bill is reflective of the concern explicit against the Arizona Immigration Law. That concern is human rights issues. As Jason Childs, State Director for the Center for Progress in Alabama stated These people are not some kind of problem to be dealt with, theyre committed members of our community, theyre human beings with inalienable rights, they have been a tremendous resource for our state (Wolverton 2011). It is ill-defined how illegal