Confessions of the Worlds Worst Parent

The essay written by Jerri fasten titled Confessions of the Worlds Worst Parent, is based on the book Free draw Kids Giving Our Children the Freedom We Had With bring out Going Nuts with Worry written by author Lenore Skenazy ( parry). Cook provides similarities nearly raising her word of honor and uses Skenazys experiences as they both point out the feeling of being judged by good fosters because they gave their s gather inrren the freedom to explore life without constant supervision. Cook shows the struggles between raising children the path she was elevated and the way society wants them to be raised today.Cook apologises to the audience in a humorous fashion the questions that entirely parents deal with, children and their freedom to explore and the paranoia that they will be hurt or taken. Presently the planet is relations with the age of too much information, along with this comes misinformation and overinflated imaginations. Cook mentions that life for children was different when she was a child children were left to their own devices and the parents trusted them to do the right thing and it did not do any harm (Cook). Cook explains throughout her that society may be producing a planet filled with paranoid parents and childrenthat cannot fend for themselves.Should parents send their children more responsibility and trust to explore and acquire life skills on their own? The method that Cook uses to make her point to the audience throughout her essay is an anecdotal technique. She uses examples from her own life raising her son and quotes from Skenazys book to occur a personal common ground with parents raising children. Cook points out the criticisms that Skenazy faced when opening her personal life to the media and sharing her child rearing skills.The use of Cooks anecdotal technique allows the readers to find a common ground with the author that is familiar and comforting. The humorous way that Cook invites the reader into her life can app eal to parents that might think they are alone with their child rearing fears about not being a good enough parent this style of composition could comfort a parent to make them feel they are not alone. Cook uses her research to find valid reasons to why parents today are too overprotective and paranoid and shares this interesting information with the audience.To pop out with, Cook gives the audience an example of how her son Josh t one-time(a) a classmate about throwing rocks at or so beavers, and a teacher overheard the school was concerned that the children were 1) being made to work too hard in the garden and 2) that they werent being properly supervised (Cook). Cook mentions that she was confused by the concern, and wondered if she was expected to get to in the car and go get them? (Cook). Unfortunately for Cook and her children, the experience left a constant impression of guilt and that Cook never wanted to be seen as the bad parent over again (Cook).From that point on Cook was constantly at their side (Cook) even though it caused whatever trouble to her and her family. Similarly, Cook mentions that Skenazy was nearly devoured by the media and other parents because she let her nine year old son push back the sweet York subway alone (Cook). Skenazy wrote a column about her sons adventure for the New York Sun (Cook) and it had caused her to be criticized by every child safety expert (Cook) which in turn initiated an probe of neglect for her son.Cook uses this example to show the different methods of parenting that exist and that some parents still feel that their children are to the full capable and intelligent enough to make good choices. On the other hand Cook explains the paranoid state of affairs that the good parents (Cook) are inflicting on their children. As a result, Cook mentions that Skenazy started her own investigating into the actual facts and statistics about children and safety. Through Cooks description of Skenazys investigati ons she learned that Not and is the fear irrational, according to the statisticians Skenazy interviewed, its based solely on perception. (Cook).This perception (Cook) can also be altered by the issue of parent peer twitch (Cook). Cook quotes Skenazy by writing, Hell hath no fury like a self-righteous parent (Cook). Furthermore, Cook explains Skenazys idea of the helicopter parent (Cook) that hover over their children wasting their time, responding to threats that dont exist (Cook). Cook illustrates the idea about the old question of how many cases have there been of children being injured or killed by tainted Halloween sugarcoat? (Cook).After doing some research and asking questions the answer to the question turned out to be none (Cook). An urban legend (Cook) that unfortunately began with a horrible incident involving relatives, in attempt to save their sorry selves, sprinkled some of the drug on the dead childs Halloween candy after a child got into a relatives stash of heroi n and died (Cook). This unfortunate incident has caused panic and concern for parents during Halloween for decades and to the dismay of children when a large portion of their candy was put in the garbage because it looked tampered with.In conclusion, Cook wrote this essay to humorously explain with anecdotes the trivial nonsense guilt that the good parents inflict on other parents that do not have the same views on the supervision of children. Cook tries to ease some of the guilt and inadequacy of being a bad parent. Cook makes light about not following parental peer pressure and raising their children as they feel comfortable and in the best interest of their children.