Justin Choi, John Chun, Gary Moliver
03.29.05
Dear Editor,
Just a couple of weeks ago, I happened to come crossways your editorial. As if the title werent ridiculous enough, I believe you wheel spoke about this inane idea that athletes un sololy receive benefits and rights as opposed to the layman, who does not do anything, but expects everything. To start off, lets just say that the First Amendment was not created for your own amusement. Secondly, you obviously cannot stick out the burden our athletes of today have taken upon themselves, such as going to practice if theyre not busy trying to mend ends meet. Not only do athletes have tougher days than the grinder employee who works an eight hour day, athletes mustiness compete in games, matches, or fights for nearly two hours at a metre in some cases. Starting at a pedant level, athletes need to be pampered by society and be enured better than others because they are such peculiar(a) and benevolent persons who refractory to take on the burden of entertaining the common man.
With the suppuration difficulty of achieving good grades and playing sports in school, it is only reliable student athletes receive some benefit for their efforts.
Student athletes must practice day and night to improve and perfect their athleticism while simultaneously doing their school work; whereas, students who do not play a sport can concentrate much on school work and receive better grades. Thus, it is only just that students who play a sport receive special benefits that allow them to be on par with those who dont. For instance, student athletes do not have as much time as other students because they must attend practice and compete in competitions; hence, they must be given additional time to consummate their school work. Furthermore, statistics show...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment