Peerless Laser Processors Questions Essay

Question 1 Describe the business writ of execution of unrivaled before the corrupt of the state-of-the art punch presses in 1991 and subsequently that? (2.5 points).AnswerIn 1981, the smart set faced a do or die determination that forced them to use unused technology. If the lasers failed, the party would swallow had nonhing to fall back upon. There was no honest frugal justification available at the clipping upon which to base the finish. By oppose in 1984 the company had a track record with the technology, had a good feel for the market and its potential growth, and was in a much stronger bewilder financially. Ted can be much more comfortable fashioning this decision because of the reduction in uncertainty. The decision is harder on one way though. When the company had its back to the wall, it was clear that something dissimilar had to happen and quickly. When the company is in a more comfortable position, the pressure to make a decision is greatly reduced, makin g it easier to procrastinate.Question 2 What factors made Ted decide to purchase three punch presses in 1991? Were these factors also what Ted turn overed for buying the 1,200-watt laser legal tender? (2.5 pts).AnswerThe decision Ted faces now is purchase the 1200-watt laser cutter, with the decision he faced in 1991 when he was considering the three punch presses. There are some potential factors with the peeled laser Peerless will be creating products that are unfamiliar to them. Peerless has no way of knowing if the new market will respond as well as the proverb firebrand market did to the anticipated improvements in quality and cycle time coming from the laser. The new product line will require polar distribution channels, different marketing techniques, and will draw new and different competition.Peerless may not be able to attract seemly business to keep the system productive. The potential benefit is, of course, a new large market to successfully apply Peerlesss laser new dwell. A significantstrategic variant that Peerless should consider is the long-term viability of the saw blade market. The success of laser press clipping (as Peerless has experienced) and other technologies has the potential to reduce the overall market for mechanical cutting devices over the long term.Question 3 Of the three major types of turn back systems cybernetic, go/no-go, and postcontrol which would have been the close useful with the first laser and wherefore? With this new laser and why? (2.5 pts).AnswerThe laser itself would use cybernetic systems to control the cutting process. The first performance project would have benefited most from cybernetic processes as well because of Peerlesss unique position. Since they were in a do or die position, they would not have treasured to kill the project for the conventional reasons. In fact, based on the regular(prenominal) parameters used for go/no-go controls, Peerless would have been justified in killing the f irst laser project. Instead, because of their dire circumstances, they stuck to their guns and eventually achieved success. The second implementation project would benefit from go/no-go controls because it is being conducted in a much more stable business environment in which where the company could back away from the project if necessary.Question 4 Calculate the variable quantity price per blade of laser cutting with this new system. Assume that the variable cost of the laser is $4/hour, that the laser custs at the rate of 40 inches per minute, that a typical blade of 14 inches diameter sells for $25, and the same calculating machine and software will be used as currently. Material cut time for a 10-blade sheet of steel is one minute. Use a 3-inch arbor hole size and assume that a cut tooth duplicate the cut distance. (2.5 pts).AnswerThe potential problems might be in purchase the 1200-watt laser following steps are needed to estimate the retribution 1. Estimate the amount o f laser cutting needed using a 14 inches saw blade as a typical product. The blade would have approximately a 44 inches circumference. 2. Based on the cutting speed of 40 inches/minute, the cutting would take 2.4 minutes. Adding time to handle the blade, and take the workstation, estimate the total timeat 3 min/blade. 3. Estimates the run cost of a 1200 watt laser at $ 10/min, making the lasers portion of the blade cost $ 30/blade, it is not a particularly significant amount for a $25 blade. 4. Estimates the cost of the laser to be about $200,000. Assume an additional $100,000 for computers and training bring the total to $300,000. 5. If the laser can produce a blade all(prenominal) 3 minutes, than it could produce 160 in eight hours at $25 a unit.Based on Exhibit 1, the current profit leeway is 12%, so its safe to assume that the single call down daily profit would equate to 160 X $25 X 12% or $480. 6. Given the $300,000 cost of the laser, the single shift retribution period would be 625 days or half that amount for a two-shift operation. In addition to the brisk payback, the laser improves quality, cycle time and flexibleness in responding to customer demand. The new laser system adds to the high tech image of the company and reinforces the employees pride. The original laser system was in all likelihood viewed as a threat to jobs when it was first implemented. Now that the company has experience with the benefits of laser cutting, they are in a better position to relinquish the investment both on non-economic and economic grounds.