The Good Enough Family :: essays research papers

<a href="http//www.geocities.com/vaksam/">Sam Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, political economy and Foreign Affairs Web SitesThe families of the not too distant yesteryear were oriented along four axes. These axes were not mutu on the wholey exclusive. Some overlapped, all of them enhanced each other. People got married because of companionable pressure and social norms (the Social Dyad), to form a more efficient or synergetic economic unit (the Economic Dyad), in pursuit of psychosexual limit (the Psychosexual Dyad), to secure a long term companionship (the knowledge Dyad). Thus, we can talk about the following four axes Social-Economic, Emotional, Utilitarian (Rational), Private-Familial. To illustrate how these axes were intertwined, let us consider the Emotional one. People got married because they matte up very strongly about living alone. But they felt so also because of social pressures. Some of them subscribed to ideologies which promoted the family as a lynchpin of society, the basic cell of the national organism, a hothouse in which to deal children to empower the nation and so on. These ideologies of personal contributions to collectives had a strong horny dimension and provided impetus to a host of behaviour patterns. The emotional investiture in todays individualistic-capitalist ideologies is no smaller. Technological developments rendered past thinking obsolete and dysfunctional but did not quench Mans thirst for guidance and a worldview. Still, as technology evolved, it became more and more disruptive in so furthermost as families were concerned. Increased mobility, a decentralization of information sources, the transfers of the traditional functions of the family to societal and private sector establishments, the increased incidence of interactions, safer sex with lesser consequences to those who steep in it all assisted the disintegration of the traditional family. Consider the trends that impact women, for instance 1. The emergence of common marital property and of laws for its equal diffusion in case of decouple constituted a shift in legal philosophy in most societies. The result was a study (and on going) distribution of wealth and its transfer from men to women. Add to this the disparities in life expectancy between the two genders and the magnitude of the redistribution of economic resources becomes evident. Women ar becoming richer at the expense of men because they live long comely to inherit them and because they get a share of the marital property when they divorce them. These "endowments" are larger than their quantifiable contribution to the formation of the wealth therefrom redistributed.